cr17_0259CORNER RECORD Document Number 17 ® ?- J
City of JURUPA VALLEY County of RIVERSIDE California
Brief Lepal Description PALA PLACE; 135' f SW'LY OF ROCK COURT
SEC. 17, T. 2 S., R. 6 W. S.B.B.M.
COORDINATES (Optional)
CORNER TYPE N.
Government Corner ❑ Control ■ Zone NAD270 NAD830
Meander ❑ Property ❑ NAD83 Epoch
Rancho ❑ Other ❑ Elevation
1 Vertical Datum: NGVD29❑ NAVD880
Date of Survey 04 2017 & 3 17 2017 Units: Metric❑ Imperial❑ U.S. Survey■
Corner — Left as found ❑ Found and tagged ❑ Established ❑ Reestablished ■ Rebuilt ❑
Identification and type of corner found; Evidence used to identify or procedure used to establish or reestablish corner:
Found as described on the reverse of this sheet.
A description of the physical condition of the monument as found and as set or reset:
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
This Corner Record was prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with
the Professional Land Surveyors' Act on 3/22/2017
Signed (. P.L.S. o� RG-ENo. L.S. 8231
COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
This Corner Record was received J ^ .2 7—/:l
examined
Signed. P.L.S. or R`6,E. No. 742/
Title Iry
County Surveyor's Comment
2007
Page 1 of 2
ro glj1 00
Document Number ZZ--07--
AFD 1 1/2" COPPER WELD STAMPED "RCE 9876", ACCEPTED AS STYPE "B" MON., STAMPED "RCE
9876" PER R1, DOWN 0.25',
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. SET GEAR, SPK & W, STAMPED IS 8231",
PER TIES HEREON, FLUSH, AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
FD RAMSFT NAIL IN T.C. NO
REF., ACCEPTED AS POSITION OF STEEL PIN AND TAG PER R1,
FD NAIL & TAG "RCE 9876"
IN T.C„ ACCEPTED AS STEEL PIN AND TAG PER R1.
O SET LEAD, TACK & TAG IS
8231" IN T.C.
R1 = COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TB
56/3
() = RECORD DISTANCE PER R1
ROCK
4-
COURT
I
Q w
�
J
Q �
d 0.
I
HH
LOT 38
io
TRACT NO. 9933-1
ro
M.B. 102/25-27
(18.18') (18.15')
18.20' 18.14' LOT 19
— —
TRACT NO. 9933-2
M.B. 102/28-29
89�,
LOT 18
ami o
TRACT NO. 9933-2
M.B. 102/28-29
1� 1�
18.23' 18.13'
(18.12')
O
`Lha mac'
THE PURPOSE OF THIS RECORD IS TO DOCUMENT THE PERPETUATION OF FOUND MONUMENT(S) PURSUANT TO THE PLS ACT SECTION
8771. NO CLAIM IS MADE REGARDING THE
CORRECTNESS OF THE POSITION(S) OF SAID MONUMENT(S), NOR THE DIMENSIONAL
RELATIONSHIP TO STREET CENTERLINES OR
PROPERTY BOUNDARIES.
Page 2 of 2